Below are some of the recent papers I’ve been on, many of them still in press at this time. I’m missing a few PDFs I’ve become aware in making this page, so I will update it. There are a number of older papers from 2025 publication that are not included here for brevity and time.
| Project | Summary |
| Herring & Ingram (in press) | In this paper, we evaluate and review how the APA ethics code intersects with Artificial Intelligence in the domain of Psychological Assessment. We discuss these gaps, offer recommendations, and hypothesize about ways in which GenAI may be used to meet emerging needs of client and clinicians from the perspective of Counseling Psychology. |
| Herring, Rogers, & Ingram (in press) | In a longitudinal (1yr) assessment-focused paper evaluating adolescent sibling dyads using the MMPI-A-RF and a host of cognitive, behavioral, and mental health data (parent, self, other). We examine ways in which multi-informant data may be harmonized to align with HiTop dimensions. |
| Shura, Rine, Ingram, Schroeder, & Armistead-Jehle (in press)) | Using a national population of Veterans assessed in MHA 2008-2024 (n~6000), we examine the MCMI validity scales and their same day relationship to the MMPI-2-RF |
| Parent & Ingram (2026) | In this study, we examine business training of health service psychologists in relation to career intention and training elements. |
| Diehl, Herring, Albertorio, Ingram, & Pagano (in press a) Diehl, Herring, Ingram, Pagano, & Gideon (in press b) | In this two paper series, we examine how (1) compensation and pension / Service Connection and (2) Service Era impact assessment profiles, building on existing work examining ways to improve assessment accuracy and reduce interpretive biases |
| Shura, Ingram, Schroeder, & Armistead-Jehle (in press) | Using a national population of Veterans assessed in MHA 2008-2024 (~30,000), we examine the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) validity scales and evaluate rates of performance to establish standard population base rate norms. |
| Aita…Ingram, et al. (2026) | A recent issue with the detection of invalidity of symptom profiles is that many scales function similarly. As a result, this base-rate approach to validate determinations examines its potential using a multi-population sample including Department of Defense and Department of Veteran Affairs persons. |
| Victor, Mitchell, & Ingram (in press) | In a longitudinal sample of depressed and highly suicidal college students (50% active ideation and past attempts), we examine how the depression, self-criticism, and NSSI relate to one another over the course of a few months. |
| Victor, Bianco, McClay, & Ingram (in press) | In this study, we created a new scale to measure the Public Stigma of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (STONSI) scale. This study included two samples, including a longitudinal high risk depression sample (see Morris et al., 2023). |
Underlined names are graduate or undergraduate students.
Dr. Paul Ingram, Ph.D 